Tag Archives: Canada citizenship

Was My Parent A Canadian? From “Lost Canadians” to Bill C-3: The 80-Year Evolution of Canadian Citizenship

John Richardson, J.D. – August 27, 2026

Were You Born To A Canadian Citizen Parent

You are reading this post because you were born outside of Canada and you would like to apply for a Certificate of Canadian Citizenship. If you were born before December 15, 2025 you are entitled to that Certificate if you can prove that you were born to a Canadian parent who was a Canadian citizen at the time that you were born.

In some cases this will be relatively easy. In some cases it will be hard. In some cases you it will require tracing your ancestry back to a time preceding Canada’s 1947 Citizenship Act. (In these cases you may have been born to a British Subject.) There are enormous ranges in far you may have to go back into your family history.

The first question is to determine how far you have to go back.

The second question is to determine what evidence (documents or otherwise) you will have to obtain to prove that you were indeed born to a Canadian citizen parent.

From “Lost Canadians” to Bill C-3: The 80-Year Evolution of Canadian Citizenship

Introduction and purpose

This is the fourth of a series of posts about Canada’s Bill C-3 which redefines (among other things) Canada’s, “citizenship by descent rules”. The first three posts are described in the Appendix to this post.

Most people understand that Canada’s Bill C-3 states that those who are born outside of Canada to a Canadian citizen parent may (depending on the date of birth) be a Canadian citizen. This is a very simple principle to understand. In some cases it’s very easy to know whether your parent was a Canadian citizen. In other cases, it’s not that easy.

The lawyer as a “practical historian”

In a previous post I referred to J.J. Robinette’s conviction that a lawyer is a “practical historian”. This is particularly true in citizenship law. The reality is that Canadian citizenship has changed very significantly over the years. A person who may not have been a citizen under the law of 1976 might be a citizen under the law of 2026.

When does Canadian citizenship law begin? When does Canadian citizenship begin?

Most of the discussion of Canadian citizenship law assumes that Canadian citizenship law begins with the Canada Citizenship Act of 1946 (taking effect in 1947). Although this is a reasonable assumption, it may be an incorrect assumption.

I begin with a “shout out” to Don Chapman. Don Chapman is a retired United Airlines pilot. For years he has been the public face of the “Lost Canadians” movement. He argues (I believe persuasively) that Canadian citizenship existed long before the 1947 Canada Citizenship Act.

Put another way: the 1947 Citizenship Act did NOT create Canadian citizenship. Rather it was a legislative expression of Canadian citizenship.

Because this post is a description of the evolution of the Canada Citizenship Act, I will NOT address the issue of the temporal origins of Canadian citizenship. This post should be considered to be a discussion of the evolution of Canada’s statutory citizenship act. Interestingly the evolution of Canada’s citizenship law is like the game of “whack a mole”. Each statutory iteration of law is intended to “fix” a problem created by the previous legislation.

Therefore, I will begin with the 1947 Canada Citizenship Act.

The 1947 Canada Citizenship Act did NOT keep up with changes in Canadian society

The problems addressed by the Canada Citizenship Act today are largely an attempt to change the effects of problems that began with the 1947 Canada Citizenship Act. Specifically, remedying the following two features of the 1947 Act have been the focus of the 1977 Act, the 2009 Act, the 2014 Act (to a lesser extent) and the 2026 Act.

Those two features of the 1947 Act were:

1. Losing Canadian citizenship because of the prohibition on dual citizenship – S. 16 – A Canadian who naturalized as a citizen of another country automatically lost his Canadian citizenship.

2. Never having received Canadian citizenship because of the problem of gender discrimination – S. 5 – If a child was born outside of Canada to a married couple, Canadian citizenship by descent was possible ONLY when the father was a Canadian citizen.

These problems were compounded because the legislative fix proposed in 1977 operated prospectively and NOT retrospectively.

From 1947 to 2026 – A Legislative Journey

What follows is a brief summary (partly AI generated) that describes the four phases of Canadian citizenship law. This is intended only to be a 30,000 foot view. Those who prefer graphs and charts might find the following “Canadian Citizenship By Descent Lineage Blueprint” to be a helpful summary:

The_Lineage_Blueprint

But first, a reminder of what Bill C-3 was intended to accomplish

Bill C-3 was an attempt (I think largely successful) to fix some of the injustices of the past. As discussed in previous posts (See the Appendix), what Bill C-3 did was:

1. Legislate that a person born outside of Canada prior to December 15, 2025, IS a Canadian citizen, if that person was born to a parent who was a Canadian citizen at the time of that person’s birth; and

2. Legislate that a child born outside of Canada after December 14, 2025, to a Canadian citizen parent, is a Canadian citizen, if the Canadian citizen parent had a “substantial connection” to Canada prior to the child’s birth. “Substantial connection” is CURRENTLY defined as 1095 days of physical presence in Canada. Note that the meaning of “substantial connection” is subject to legislative change!

To understand why Bill C-3 was necessary and some of the problems it was intended to fix, it’s important to understand the “Evolution Of Canadian Citizenship By Birth”. Specifically, it’s important to understand, in a general way, how each major legislative revision was designed to fix a problem caused by previous legislation.

Continue reading

Canadian Citizenship By Descent – A Search For Proof (To Prove The Truth) – 4 Perspectives

John Richardson, J.D. – August 13, 2026

Introduction

This is the second post in a series of posts designed to explore Canadian citizenship generally and Canada’s citizenship by descent rules specifically. The first post (which I suggest you read first) explained how Canada’s citizenship by descent rules work. If you haven’t read it, I suggest that you read it now.

Understanding The Citizenship By Descent Provisions Of Bill C-3 – The Canada Citizenship Act

For those who prefer a visual blueprint to determine whether you ARE a Canadian citizen see:

Bill_C3_Citizenship_Blueprint

This post is organized in the following parts:

Part A – The difference between knowing what to do and doing what you know!

Part B – Proving your parent was a Canadian citizen

Part C – Proving 1095 days of physical presence

Let’s begin.

Continue reading

Part 4 – Canada Bill – C71 Will Increase Citizenship By Descent Options For US Citizens Seeking Canada/US Dual Citizenship

Introduction And Summary

This is Part 4 in my “Little Red Dual Citizenship Book” Series. For parts 1 to 5, see the Appendix.

A recent article in the Boston Globe is evidence that more and more Americans are interested in acquiring a second citizenship. Second citizenship can be obtained through naturalization, investment or citizenship by descent. “Citizenship by descent” is citizenship conferred based on one’s relationship – ancestry – to a parent or grandparent. The nature of the ancestral relationship depends on the country. Countries offering citizenship by descent include: Italy, Ireland, Poland, Canada and many other European countries. Citizenship by ancestry is often referred to as “citizenship by descent”. The basic principle is that one acquires citizenship because of a familial relationship to a citizen of that country. Increasing numbers of people are learning that through ancestry, they may be able acquire or document a second citizenship.

An option for “citizenship by descent” that is much closer to home – Canada – will soon be an option for more U.S. citizens than it is under exiting law.

Citizenship By Descent – Equal Treatment And Opportunity For All Canadian Citizens

The precise rules governing citizenship by descent vary from country to country. The rules governing citizenship by descent have many difficulties. Should ANY citizen be able to pass his/her citizenship on to the next generation? Does the physical connection to the country of citizenship matter? Should citizenship by descent rules operate so that acquisition of descent can be available for many generations? These questions were explored in the context of Canada’s Charter of Rights And Freedoms.

Continue reading

The "Exit Tax": Dual US/Canada citizen from birth, no Canada citizenship today = no exemption to US "Exit Tax"

The above tweet references a “guest post” written by Dominic Ferszt of Cape Town South Africa. The post demonstrates how the “dual citizen from birth” exemption to the S. 877A “Exit Tax” relies on the citizenship laws of other nations. In some cases those laws of other nations are arbitrary and unjust. If these laws were U.S. laws, they might violate the equal protection and/or due process guarantees found in the United States constitution. For example, Mr. Ferszt describes how the “dual citizenship exemption” to the “Ext Tax” is dependent on South African “Apartheid Laws”. He describes a situation where a “black” U.S. citizen from birth is denied the benefits of the dual citizen exemption to the Exit Tax, which are available to a “white” dual citizen from birth. (During the “Apartheid Era” Blacks were not entitled to South African citizenship.)

So, what’s the S. 877A “Exit Tax”  dual citizen exemption and how does it work?

The dual citizen exemption, which I have discussed in previous posts,  is found in Internal Revenue Code S. 877A(g)(1)(B) and reads:

(B) Exceptions An individual shall not be treated as meeting the requirements of subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 877(a)(2) if—

(i) the individual—

(I) became at birth a citizen of the United States and a citizen of another country and, as of the expatriation date, continues to be a citizen of, and is taxed as a resident of, such other country, and
(II) has been a resident of the United States (as defined in section 7701(b)(1)(A)(ii)) for not more than 10 taxable years during the 15-taxable year period ending with the taxable year during which the expatriation date occurs, or

Entitlement to the “dual citizen exemption” depends entirely on the citizenship laws of other countries …

Continue reading