Category Archives: Extradition

Dan Duggan Part 2 – For The Sake Of Its Citizens And Sovereignty Australia Must Terminate The Extradition Treaty With The United States

Introduction and purpose:

This is the second post motivated by the Dan Duggan extradition proceedings. The first post was:

U.S. Australian Extradition Treaty: 1974 Original Treaty And 1997 – How Does It Apply To Dan Duggan?

Outline:

Part A – About U.S. Extradition treaties
Part B – Examples Of Using Extradition Treaties To Facilitate The Application Of U.S. Law:
Part C – Why countries really need to end their extradition treaties with the United States
Part D – The Dan Duggan Case – Why Australia Should Refuse Extradition
Appendix – Michael Lynch – AI – Who Would Have Imagined An Extradition Treaty Being Used In The Context Of A Private Contract?

Continue reading

U.S. Australian Extradition Treaty: 1974 Original Treaty And 1997 – How Does It Apply To Dan Duggan?

Introduction and purpose:

Some more background …

The U.S. indictment (containing their version of the facts) of Dan Dugan is here.

Mr. Duggan’s citizenship status is an issue …

https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/backgroundbriefing/notorious-04-from-top-gun-to-wanted-man/104036632

https://mediacore-live-production.akamaized.net/audio/01/va/Z/ui.mp3

24:34 to about 27:10 – begins talking about U.S. citizenship relinquishment in January 26, 2012. He gets the certificate in 2016. U.S. claiming that he is a citizen until gets a CLN.

https://www.listennotes.com/podcast-clips/notorious-04-from-top-gun-to-wanted-man-P24udWMzkDw/
https://audio.listennotes.com/e/p/a72a45e1cc694f65876a5706e9418203/

The case of Dan Duggan continues. His case involves many issues. An excellent summary and analysis appeared on July 22, 2025 in an article by Paul Degrorie – an Australian based journalist.

https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/duggan-remains-imprisoned-without-charge-after-1000-days-to-satisfy-our-imperial-masters/

One of the issues is whether Mr. Duggan was a U.S. citizen at the time of alleged offenses.

Australia has a number of “international crime” agreements. A partial description of what they are and how they work is here. The purpose of this post is to consolidate the 1974 Australian U.S. extradition treaty and the 1997 protocol to have the provisions in one place. Extradition is complicated. Changes in the law of one country can affect whether the extradition may apply. For example, here is a situation where a chnage in Mexico’s laws impacts whether the U.S. has rights of extradition under the U.S. Mexico extradition treaty.

Consolidation of the 1974 U.S./Australian Extradition Treaty with 1974 original treaty and 1997 protocol included:

Note: See Appendix C for a description of HOW the United States interprets the treaty.

________________________________________________________________________-

The parts of the 1974 treaty that have been deleted appear with a line drawn through them.

The parts of the 1997 protocol that are new appear in italics.

The parts that are unaffected remain the same.

TREATY ON EXTRADITION BETWEEN AUSTRALIA AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

AUSTRALIA AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, desiring to make more effective the cooperation of the two countries for the reciprocal extradition of offenders, agree as follows:

Continue reading

Canadian citizenship: When citizenship in one country affords rights of access to another country

Part I – Citizenship in the 21st century

In the 20th century few people thought much about citizenship. Few people thought about the value of multiple citizenships.

In the 21st century people think about citizenships. People are beginning to see the value of having more than one citizenship. They are also (because of the awareness (caused by FATCA) of U.S. citizenship taxation) beginning to see the value of NOT being a U.S. citizen. (Interestingly U.S. Senator Ron Wyden is claiming that dual citizenship provides enhanced opportunities for tax evasion.)

When people renounce U.S. citizenship they will experience the following changes:

1. For U.S. immigration purposes they cease to be U.S. citizens and are treated by the United States like all other citizens of their country of citizenship; and

2. For U.S. tax purposes they cease to be “U.S. Persons” and become “nonresident aliens”. (This loss of U.S. citizenship may or may not be a benefit depending on their individual circumstances). The definitions of “U.S. Person” and “nonresident alien” are found in “26 U.S. Code § 7701 – Definitions“.

When citizenship may afford enhanced rights of access to other countries

Those with more than one citizenship will remember situations where citizenship in one country provided benefits that citizenship in another country did not. Sometimes the benefits are mundane (citizens of one country paying less for an entry visa than citizens of another country). Sometimes citizenship is a condition for various kinds of “enhanced entry programs” (think the U.S. Global Entry programs that include NEXUS.) Sometimes the benefits are more substantive (visa free access for citizens of country A and no visa free access for citizens of country B). Sometimes citizenship in one country gives the right to live in other countries (think citizenship in EU countries). Sometimes citizenship in one country gives the right to seek specific employment in other countries (think Canada-US-Mexico TN visas.) Sometimes there are tax advantages (the France U.S. tax treaty affords interesting tax benefits for U.S. citizens living in France). Sometimes citizenship can protect a person from extradition requests (civil law countries are reluctant to allow their citizens to be extradited). Sometimes citizenship can protect a person from tax enforcement claims from another country (the U.S./Canada tax treaty affords certain protections to individuals based on citizenship status). Sometimes citizenship can protect a person from certain kinds of taxation (Canada’s “Underused Housing Tax” and the BC “Speculation and Vacancy Tax” are recent examples). The point is that citizenship may (and often does) afford benefits that extend beyond the right to live and work in a country. When considering whether to seek various citizenships or renounce various citizenships it is important to think beyond the basic right to live in a country.

Conclusion: ANY change in your citizenship (whether renouncing U.S. citizenship or acquiring an additional citizenship) should consider the issues raised above!!

Part II – What about Canadian citizenship? What do Canadians give up by renouncing U.S. citizenship? What are the reasons (there are many) why Permanent Residents of Canada should naturalize as Canadian citizens?

Because of generous and easy access to the United States, Canadian citizens who renounce U.S. citizenship give up far less than citizens of many other countries. Furthermore, becoming a Canadian citizen affords many privileges vis-a-vis the United States and Canada.

Rather than list the reasons individually I am pleased (with his kind permission) to refer you to a recent post by Los Angeles based immigration lawyer Parviz Malakouti-Fitzgerald, Esq. The post – Six Benefits of Canadian Citizenship for Access to the U.S. Market – is referenced in the following tweet.

The post has its origins in a recent twitter exchange and begins as follows:

Does being a Canadian citizen offer unique benefits of access to the United States market?

This is more-or-less the question I read on twitter from U.S. citizenship renunciation expert John Richardson last week on the last day of 2023.

“Question on @Quora: Is the only real advantage in being a Canadian in accessing the US market, six months visa free stays & a limited range of professions on the TN visa list which also does not lead do a Green Card? No special concessions or fast track ..”

The author provides an excellent, well researched summary. It not only demonstrates why Canadians give up less by renouncing U.S. citizenship but also why Canadian citizenship is valuable to have.

I encourage you to read the complete post here …

https://www.malakoutilaw.com/six-benefits-of-canadian-citizenship-for-access-to-the-u-s-market

John Richardson – Follow me on Twitter @Expatriationlaw

Extradition Is One Way That Changes In Another Country’s Tax Laws May Change Your Tax Relationship With The US

Prologue

As long as the US continues to employ citizenship taxation any changes in US tax law will continue to have unintended consequences on Americans abroad. In March of 2022 I outlined how some of the tax changes proposed in the 2023 Biden Green book would impact US citizens who live outside the United States. As important as US tax changes are, Americans abroad must be aware of how changes in the laws of their country of residence may also impact their “tax relationship” with the United States.

The purpose of this post is provide five simple examples. Some of the examples are based on Canada’s tax laws and others are of a more general nature.

Continue reading