– General description Solving The Problems of U.S. Citizenship here
When: Sunday November 30, 2014
Time: 6:30 p.m. – 8:30 p.m.
Where: University of Toronto – Carr Hall – 100 St. Joseph St – Toronto, Ontario
Who: John Richardson with Special Guest Pasadena International Tax Lawyer Phil Hodgen
Cost: $20 or $40 for a family of four
I am delighted to have Phil participate in this session! This is a great opportunity for all attendees.
Update – December 8, 2014:
Here is a description of the session with Phil Hodgen written by an antendee.
The following event organized by ACA may be of interest to a “world-wide” audience. It is modestly priced and available by webinar.
“Changes in the US Tax Laws: How they impact US Citizens in the UK”
Update January 2018: This post has been updated with some new links and discussion.
Prologue – The “Story Of The Century
Since July 1, 2014, the United States via threats threats of the FATCA Sanction, has begun a “world wide hunt” for people born in the United States (or are otherwise
deemed to be “U.S. tax subjects”). A compilation of my posts describing the mechanics, effects and costs of FATCA and the FATCA IGAs is available in “ The Little Red FATCA Book“. FATCA has spawned litigation against both the U.S. and Canadian Governments. A discussion of the “Alliance For The Defense Of Canadian Sovereignty” FATCA lawsuit against the Government of Canada is available here. Some thoughts on the “U.S. FATCA Legal Action” lawsuit against the U.S. Government are here. Both lawsuits have been vigorously defended by the respective Governments. The U.S. lawsuit may have reached the end of its viability (lack of standing and various procedural issues). The Canadian lawsuit continues.
With respect to those “Born In The USA”, the U.S. legal “claim of tax jurisdiction” is two-fold:
1. Those born in the United States (unless they have relinquished U.S. citizenship” for both tax and nationality purposes) are U.S. citizens.
2. Citizens of the United States are subject to the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code regardless of where they live in the world.
The Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) includes but is not limited to the obligation to pay taxes according to U.S. tax rules. The “IRC” also includes a wide range of “ penalty laden reporting requirements“. The “IRC” also strongly discourages (through penalties and sanctions) participation in non-U.S. pension plans, non-U.S. investments (including non-U.S. mutual funds), the use of “ non-U.S. business corporations” and (incredibly) non-U.S. spouses. (Even the divorce of a U.S. citizen and non-citizen is likely to be significantly more expensive.) As a result, the “extra-territorial application of the “IRC”) has the effect of exercising U.S. “control” over the lives of it’s citizens who do NOT live in the United States. Therefore, it is clear that the “extra-territorial” application of the “IRC” both (1) imposes the full force of the “IRC” on the resident/citizens of other countries and (2) has the effect of imposing the U.S. cultural values mandated in the “IRC” on those other countries. One can identify a list of the “10 Commandments” which are imposed on Americans abroad in an FBAR and FATCA world.
(Note that with the exception of U.S. citizens and “permanent residents”, as per Internal Revenue Code Sec. 7701(b), an actual
physical connection to the United States is required to establish U.S. tax residency.)
As the article referenced in the above tweet makes clear, many people “claimed” by the United States as “tax residents”have never had any connection to the United States except that they were born there. The article includes:
This entry was posted in
accidental Americans, American expatriates, citizenship taxation, Cook v. Tait, FATCA, International tax policy and tagged ACA Global, Bernard Schneider, Boris Johnson, citizenship-based taxation, FATCA, FBAR, Michael Kirsch on . November 6, 2014