Tag Archives: dual citizenship

Was My Parent A Canadian? From “Lost Canadians” to Bill C-3: The 80-Year Evolution of Canadian Citizenship

John Richardson, J.D. – August 27, 2026

Were You Born To A Canadian Citizen Parent

You are reading this post because you were born outside of Canada and you would like to apply for a Certificate of Canadian Citizenship. If you were born before December 15, 2025 you are entitled to that Certificate if you can prove that you were born to a Canadian parent who was a Canadian citizen at the time that you were born.

In some cases this will be relatively easy. In some cases it will be hard. In some cases you it will require tracing your ancestry back to a time preceding Canada’s 1947 Citizenship Act. (In these cases you may have been born to a British Subject.) There are enormous ranges in far you may have to go back into your family history.

The first question is to determine how far you have to go back.

The second question is to determine what evidence (documents or otherwise) you will have to obtain to prove that you were indeed born to a Canadian citizen parent.

From “Lost Canadians” to Bill C-3: The 80-Year Evolution of Canadian Citizenship

Introduction and purpose

This is the fourth of a series of posts about Canada’s Bill C-3 which redefines (among other things) Canada’s, “citizenship by descent rules”. The first three posts are described in the Appendix to this post.

Most people understand that Canada’s Bill C-3 states that those who are born outside of Canada to a Canadian citizen parent may (depending on the date of birth) be a Canadian citizen. This is a very simple principle to understand. In some cases it’s very easy to know whether your parent was a Canadian citizen. In other cases, it’s not that easy.

The lawyer as a “practical historian”

In a previous post I referred to J.J. Robinette’s conviction that a lawyer is a “practical historian”. This is particularly true in citizenship law. The reality is that Canadian citizenship has changed very significantly over the years. A person who may not have been a citizen under the law of 1976 might be a citizen under the law of 2026.

When does Canadian citizenship law begin? When does Canadian citizenship begin?

Most of the discussion of Canadian citizenship law assumes that Canadian citizenship law begins with the Canada Citizenship Act of 1946 (taking effect in 1947). Although this is a reasonable assumption, it may be an incorrect assumption.

I begin with a “shout out” to Don Chapman. Don Chapman is a retired United Airlines pilot. For years he has been the public face of the “Lost Canadians” movement. He argues (I believe persuasively) that Canadian citizenship existed long before the 1947 Canada Citizenship Act.

Put another way: the 1947 Citizenship Act did NOT create Canadian citizenship. Rather it was a legislative expression of Canadian citizenship.

Because this post is a description of the evolution of the Canada Citizenship Act, I will NOT address the issue of the temporal origins of Canadian citizenship. This post should be considered to be a discussion of the evolution of Canada’s statutory citizenship act. Interestingly the evolution of Canada’s citizenship law is like the game of “whack a mole”. Each statutory iteration of law is intended to “fix” a problem created by the previous legislation.

Therefore, I will begin with the 1947 Canada Citizenship Act.

The 1947 Canada Citizenship Act did NOT keep up with changes in Canadian society

The problems addressed by the Canada Citizenship Act today are largely an attempt to change the effects of problems that began with the 1947 Canada Citizenship Act. Specifically, remedying the following two features of the 1947 Act have been the focus of the 1977 Act, the 2009 Act, the 2014 Act (to a lesser extent) and the 2026 Act.

Those two features of the 1947 Act were:

1. Losing Canadian citizenship because of the prohibition on dual citizenship – S. 16 – A Canadian who naturalized as a citizen of another country automatically lost his Canadian citizenship.

2. Never having received Canadian citizenship because of the problem of gender discrimination – S. 5 – If a child was born outside of Canada to a married couple, Canadian citizenship by descent was possible ONLY when the father was a Canadian citizen.

These problems were compounded because the legislative fix proposed in 1977 operated prospectively and NOT retrospectively.

From 1947 to 2026 – A Legislative Journey

What follows is a brief summary (partly AI generated) that describes the four phases of Canadian citizenship law. This is intended only to be a 30,000 foot view. Those who prefer graphs and charts might find the following “Canadian Citizenship By Descent Lineage Blueprint” to be a helpful summary:

The_Lineage_Blueprint

But first, a reminder of what Bill C-3 was intended to accomplish

Bill C-3 was an attempt (I think largely successful) to fix some of the injustices of the past. As discussed in previous posts (See the Appendix), what Bill C-3 did was:

1. Legislate that a person born outside of Canada prior to December 15, 2025, IS a Canadian citizen, if that person was born to a parent who was a Canadian citizen at the time of that person’s birth; and

2. Legislate that a child born outside of Canada after December 14, 2025, to a Canadian citizen parent, is a Canadian citizen, if the Canadian citizen parent had a “substantial connection” to Canada prior to the child’s birth. “Substantial connection” is CURRENTLY defined as 1095 days of physical presence in Canada. Note that the meaning of “substantial connection” is subject to legislative change!

To understand why Bill C-3 was necessary and some of the problems it was intended to fix, it’s important to understand the “Evolution Of Canadian Citizenship By Birth”. Specifically, it’s important to understand, in a general way, how each major legislative revision was designed to fix a problem caused by previous legislation.

Continue reading

You Have Your Certificate Of Canadian Citizenship – What Next? Six Options For Newly Recognized Canadians

John Richardson, J.D. – August 13, 2026

Introduction and purpose

This is the third of a series of posts to help you understand Canadian citizenship by descent. Canada’s Bill C-3 which took effect on December 15, 2025 made major changes to Canada’s citizenship laws. By changing it’s “citizenship by descent” rules, Canada has created an opportunity for many U.S. citizens to be formally recognized as Canadian citizens. This series of posts has been designed to understand Canada’s Bill C-3 (effective December 15, 2025) and understand how and why these changes are so valuable for many U.S. citizens.

A series of posts

The first post focused on Understanding The Citizenship By Descent Provisions Of Bill C-3 – The Canada Citizenship Act. Specifically what factual conditions would result in an indiviudal being a Canadian citizen and therefore entitled to a Certificate of Canadian citizenship? (Note that with the exception of naturalization or direct grant, one would, under Canadian law, be a Canadian citizen from birth. Those born in the United States are U.S. citizens from birth. Hence, many people, recognized as Canadian citizens from birth, would be Canada/U.S. dual citizens from birth.)

Understanding The Citizenship By Descent Provisions Of Bill C-3 – The Canada Citizenship Act

The second post is a discussion of “Canadian Citizenship By Descent – A Search For Proof (To Prove The Truth)

Canadian Citizenship By Descent – A Search For Proof (To Prove The Truth) – 4 Perspectives

If citizenship cannot be proven, it has no functional or practical existence. Therefore, those seeking a Certificate of Canadian citizenship embark on “a search for proof”. Although the law does not establish a formal deadline to submit the application for a “Certificate of Canadian Citizenship”, I suggest applying as quickly as possible. Laws can and do change!

This third post is to explore why eligibility for a “Certificate of Canadian Citizenshp” matters. What good is it to be a Canadian citizen? What role could Canadian citizenship play in your life. So, you are a Canadian citizen? What do you do with it? How can it benefit you and your descendants? I suggest that (particularly as a U.S. citizen) that there are (at least) six ways that having a Canadian passport could enhance your life.

What does it mean to be a Canadian citizen? What does it mean to move to Canada as a Canadian citizen?

This post is organized in the following Parts.

Part A – Taxation is destiny – moving to another country always has tax implications

Part B – If you move to Canada and renounce U.S. citizenship you may be subject to the U.S. “Exit Tax” rules

Part C – A review of who IS a Canadian citizen and entitled to a Certificate of Canadian citizenship”

Part D – I have my certificate of Canadian citizenship – what do I do with it? How do I turn it into a family heirloom? How can I sponsor my spouse?

Part E – Six specific opportunities Canadian citizenship provides to U.S. citizens

Part F – Renouncing U.S. citizenship and having access to the United States as a Canadian citizen

Conclusion

Appendix A – The 877A U.S. Exit Tax Rules

Appendix B – The 877A “dual citizen from birth” exemption to the Exit Tax Rules

Appendix C – The legislative text of the “dual citizen from birth” exemption to “covered expatriate” status

Here we go …

Continue reading

Thoughts On Ohio Senator Moreneo’s “Exclusive Citizenship Act Of 2025”

Background

On December 1, 2025 Ohio Senator Bernie Moreno, tabled his “Exclusive Citizenship Act Of 2025″.

A pdf of the proposed legislation is available here:

Exclusive-Citizenship-Act-of-2025

The progress of the legislation (if any) may be followed here.

It was immediately understood that the Moreno bill would affect both Melania and Baron Trump, each of whom has dual U.S./Slovenian citizenship.


My comments on the proposed legislation fall into ten categories:

1. What the Bill is intended to achieve

2. What the Bill assumes about the meaning of citizenship

3. Constitutionality – Conflicts with the 14th Amendment

4. Inside Looking Out (American dual citizens living inside the United States)

5. Outside looking in (Americans Dual Citizens Abroad)

6. Effect on Green Card Holders – Will they naturalize as U.S. citizens?

7. Creating a data base of citizenship and multiple citizenships

8. Creating a situation where the laws of another country could impact who can enter politics and serve in public office in the United States

9. Effect on Internal Revenue Code 877A – Will an Exit Tax be payable if a U.S. citizen is deemed to have relinquished U.S. citizenship?

10. The Secretary Of State and the authority to make regulations

Possible conclusion:

Should the Moreno bill be enacted it would fundamentally change the nature of U.S. citizenship which already carries significant restrictions and obligations. It would certainly associate U.S. citizenship with a general loss of freedom.

It is blatantly obvious that in the 21st century that U.S. citizenship is NOT compatible with the freedom of the individual.

Continue reading

Part 1: Colorado Congressman Jeff Hurd Recognizes Problems Of U.S. Citizenship Taxation

Part A – Introducing H.R. 4501

H.R.4501 – To protect the citizenship of, and provide tax-exempt status to, any American elected as the Supreme Pontiff of the Roman Catholic Church.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/4501

Here is the text of the bill. It’s amazingly clear. It’s amazingly honest. It states that Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code will not apply to Pope Leo. It is certainly one of the most honest and clear carve outs I have ever seen. (Interestingly it would NOT exempt Pope Leo from subtitle F which contains the international information return reporting requirements.)

BILLS-119hr4501ih

Let’s break H.R.4501 down:

H.R.4501 – To protect the citizenship of, and provide tax-exempt status to, any American elected as the Supreme Pontiff of the Roman Catholic Church.

H.R.4501 – To 1. protect the citizenship of (U.S. citizens abroad are being forced to renounce U.S. citizenship because of citizenship taxation) , and 2. provide tax-exempt status to (end U.S. citizenship tax jurisdiction over), any 3. American (U.S. citizen and possibly resident) 4. elected as the Supreme Pontiff of the Roman Catholic Church (appears to condition the benefit based on religion – 14th Amendment issue?).

At present there is no more information on the government site.

Part B – The tax exemption directly implicates the issue of citizenship taxation

The Internal Revenue Code (see section 1) clearly states that U.S. citizens are subject to taxation on their worldwide income. Therefore, for Pope Leo to NOT be considered a U.S. tax resident either:

1. The Internal Revenue Code would require some kind of amendment. The amendment might be a move to “residence-based taxation” or a special carve out for Pope Leo. (An example of a special carve out might be: “Individual” does not include a U.S. citizen Pope”); or

2. It could be incorporated into “A Simple Regulatory Fix For Citizenship Taxation“.

The point is that NO MATTER how this would be achieved it WILL require a rethinking of “citizenship taxation”. It will also require ensuring (if this is even possible that the amendment meet constitutional standards).

Part C – The statement of Congressman Hurd

H.R.4501 was introduced by Congressman Jeff Hurd from Colorado. The wikipedia article describes Hurd as being Catholic (presumably explaining his interest in this issue).

Interestingly, Congressman Hurd’s wife (by her own admission) was born in Czechoslovakia and may be a Czech citizen. If so, this might mean that Congressman Hurd’s five children are (by birth or naturalization) dual U.S./Czech citizens.

Further commentary about the possibility of U.S./Slovokia dual citizenship is here and here.

A press release describing H.R.4501 on his site states:

Rep. Hurd Introduces Holy Sovereignty Protection Act to Safeguard Citizenship for American Popes

July 18, 2025
Press Release

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, Congressman Jeff Hurd (CO-03) introduced the Holy Sovereignty Protection Act (H.R. 4501), legislation to protect the U.S. citizenship of any American elected to serve as the Supreme Pontiff of the Roman Catholic Church. The bill prohibits the revocation of citizenship during a papal tenure and exempts the individual from U.S. tax obligations while serving as pope, recognizing his unique role as both a religious leader and head of state.

“The election of Pope Leo XIV marks a historic moment not only for the Catholic Church but for America,” said Rep. Hurd. “This legislation ensures that any American who answers the call to lead more than a billion Catholics worldwide can do so without risking his citizenship or facing unnecessary tax burdens. This legislation recognizes the extraordinary nature of the papacy—a role at the intersection of faith, leadership, and global responsibility.”

Significantly, the press release acknowledges Congressman Hurd’s belief and understanding that:

– certain activities can trigger the involuntary relinquishment of U.S. citizenship (not the case since the 1967 decision in Afroyim v. Rusk); and

– the problematic nature of U.S. citizenship taxation (specifically the imposition of U.S. worldwide taxation on U.S. citizens living outside the United States).

Part D – Why H.R.4501 is helpful to Americans abroad and the fight for residence-based taxation

The introduction of H.R. 4501 is a clear recognition that citizenship-based taxation presents unnecessary problems (and burdens) for Americans abroad. Although Congressman Hurd does NOT suggest that Americans abroad are renouncing their citizenship because of the U.S. extra-territorial regime, the quest to “Save The Pope” is a clear recognition of the problems caused by the exiting regime.

Given that H.R.4501 appears to provide a benefit based solely on affiliation with a specific religion, I suspect that it is dead on arrival. That said, it can (and should) be used to raise the question of why ANY U.S. citizen living outside the United States should be subject to the U.S. worldwide/extra-territorial taxation regime.

Specifically, H.R.4501 is support for both President Trump’s pledge to end the double taxation of Americans abroad and the LaHood bill which was introduced in December of 2018. I suggest that it be interpreted in this spirit.

Part E – What Americans abroad and their champions should do

This is simple. As a Catholic Congressman Hurd has an interest in maintaining the viability of a U.S. citizen Pope. As a father Congressman Hurd has an interesting in enhancing the life opportunities of his children to ensure that their life opportunities are not dampened by U.S. citizenship taxation.

I would reach out to Congressman Hurd and enlist his aid in supporting the ending of the double taxation of Americans abroad!

John Richardson – Follow me on X.com @ExpatriationLaw

Appendix

Here is a July 30, 2025 “X Spaces” discussion about the Hurd bill:

Part 6 – What Would A Ban On Dual Citizenship Mean For U.S. Citizens?

The Little Red Dual Citizenship Book

See the Appendix for a list of posts making up the “Little Red Dual Citizenship Book”

Whether or not it’s “fake news” …

It started with what purported to be a post by President Trump on “Truth Social” that he was going to attempt to end dual citizenship. This was immediately exposed as a “Fake Post”. Nevertheless, I came across an interesting video of what it would mean if Americans were somehow banned from being dual citizens. Without regard to the “fakeness” of the claim that President Trump was interested in ending dual citizenship, the video is interesting.

John Richardson – Follow me on X.com @ExpatriationLaw

Appendix – Posts That Make Up The “Little Red Dual Citizenship Book”

Part 1 – Dual Citizenship Reporting

Part 1 – Citizenship-based reporting: Russia’s "citizenship reporting" requirements – will the United States be next?

Part 2 – Under What Circumstances Is Citizenship By Ancestry Justified?

Part 2 – Citizenship Matters With @RonanMcCrea: Citizenship By Descent Can Be High Risk For A Country In A Less Global World

Part 3 – Could U.S./Canada Dual Citizens Residing In Canada Determine The Outcome Of A U.S. Election? (The Democrats Hope So)

Part 3 – Could The November 3, 2020 US Election Be Decided By Canadian Residents With US/CDN Dual Citizenship?


Part 4 – A Change In Canadian Law Increase Canadian “Citizenship Through Ancestry” Options For Americans

Part 4 – Canada Bill – C71 Will Increase Citizenship By Descent Options For US Citizens Seeking Canada/US Dual Citizenship

Part 5 – When Dual Citizenship For The Individual, Becomes “Duel Citizenship” For The State

Part 5 – The Clash Of Citizenships: When Dual Citizenship For The Individual Becomes Duel Citizenship For The State

Part 6 – What Would Ending Dual Citizenship Look Like For U.S. Citizens?

Part 6 – What Would A Ban On Dual Citizenship Mean For U.S. Citizens?

Part 5 – The Clash Of Citizenships: When Dual Citizenship For The Individual Becomes Duel Citizenship For The State

Introduction And Summary

This is Part 5 in my “Little Red Dual Citizenship Book” Series. For parts 1 to 4, see the Appendix.

The proliferation of “dual citizenship” in the 21st century is a benefit for individuals. As Boston Globe Correspondent journalist David Shribman explains, dual citizenship may be a critical part of an individual’s identity. That said, “dual citizenship” may not be a benefit (and may be a danger) for countries in certain circumstances. The purpose of this post is (in part) to question whether dual citizens of a country should have the same class of rights as those who are ONLY citizens of the country. Should Canada/US dual citizens living in Canada have the same rights of citizenship as those who are ONLY Canadian citizens living in Canada. For example, should dual citizens be permitted to vote in Canadian elections? Should dual citizens be permitted to run for public office?

This recent article in the Toronto Globe and Mail reinforces the validity of this question.

Continue reading

Part 4 – Canada Bill – C71 Will Increase Citizenship By Descent Options For US Citizens Seeking Canada/US Dual Citizenship

Introduction And Summary

This is Part 4 in my “Little Red Dual Citizenship Book” Series. For parts 1 to 5, see the Appendix.

A recent article in the Boston Globe is evidence that more and more Americans are interested in acquiring a second citizenship. Second citizenship can be obtained through naturalization, investment or citizenship by descent. “Citizenship by descent” is citizenship conferred based on one’s relationship – ancestry – to a parent or grandparent. The nature of the ancestral relationship depends on the country. Countries offering citizenship by descent include: Italy, Ireland, Poland, Canada and many other European countries. Citizenship by ancestry is often referred to as “citizenship by descent”. The basic principle is that one acquires citizenship because of a familial relationship to a citizen of that country. Increasing numbers of people are learning that through ancestry, they may be able acquire or document a second citizenship.

An option for “citizenship by descent” that is much closer to home – Canada – will soon be an option for more U.S. citizens than it is under exiting law.

Citizenship By Descent – Equal Treatment And Opportunity For All Canadian Citizens

The precise rules governing citizenship by descent vary from country to country. The rules governing citizenship by descent have many difficulties. Should ANY citizen be able to pass his/her citizenship on to the next generation? Does the physical connection to the country of citizenship matter? Should citizenship by descent rules operate so that acquisition of descent can be available for many generations? These questions were explored in the context of Canada’s Charter of Rights And Freedoms.

Continue reading

Yes, Naomi Osaka is Japanese. And American. And Haitian

Yes, Naomi Osaka is Japanese. And American. And Haitian

Netflix

Aoife Wilkinson, The University of Queensland

On Friday, Naomi Osaka lit the cauldron at the 2020 Tokyo Olympics opening ceremony. This honour sent an important message to the world: Osaka represents a diversifying Japan.

Yet, some still question whether she really is Japanese.
The question we should be asking instead is: who is Naomi Osaka, really?

Netflix’s new three-part documentary series attempts to answer this question. Director Garrett Bradley followed the tennis player over two years from her first grand slam win in 2018 to her third in 2020.

The documentary touches on her tennis career, her mental health and her call to change the format of post-match press conferences.

But it also gives viewers a closer look at Osaka finding her voice in the world as a young, mixed-race Japanese Haitian woman.

The difference between nationality and race

In the documentary, Osaka speaks about her decision to renounce her American nationality in 2019. Reflecting on the public’s response to her decision, she felt “people really don’t know the difference between nationality and race”.

She is right when she says there is a difference.

Nationality is a form of legal identification specifying our membership to a nation. Race refers to physical appearances, and is often described as a social construct: not determined by scientific fact, but rather by the social meaning collectively attributed to biological traits. To avoid uncomfortable conversations, some choose to use the word “ethnicity” instead of race, a term used to define groups based on invisible factors like language or customs.

Osaka holding a tennis racquet.
The documentary follows Osaka as she plays tennis, but also as she finds her way as a young woman.
Netflix

Despite the difference in their meanings, race, nationality and ethnicity are deeply interconnected in the ways we discuss identity.

Osaka was born in Japan in 1997 to her Japanese mother and Haitian father. She moved to the United States when she was three and grew up there as a Japanese-American dual national.

During the two years when the documentary was in production, Osaka celebrated her 22nd birthday. According to Japanese Nationality Law, dual Japanese nationals are required to renounce one of their nationalities before they turn 22.

For many, the decision to forfeit one nationality is tricky, uncomfortable and, where possible, avoided by dual nationals only showing their Japanese passport at Japanese airports.

In my research on mixed-race Japanese youth in Australia, participants told me their dual nationality opens up economic and personal opportunities for them to live or work in Japan without the restrictions of a visa.

But perhaps more importantly, the thought of forfeiting their nationality was a great concern for those who saw it as an intrinsic part of their identity.

In the documentary, Osaka says her decision to become a sole Japanese national was an obvious one. “I’ve been playing under the Japanese flag since I was 14”, she says. “It was never even a secret that I was gonna play for Japan for the Olympics.”

But while it was obvious, it wasn’t easy. Some people saw this renouncing of her American citizenship as a decision to forfeit her Black identity:

I don’t choose America and suddenly people are like, “your Black card is revoked”. And it’s like, African American isn’t the only Black, you know?

Despite choosing to become a sole Japanese national, Osaka is both Japanese and Haitian, and holds deep connections to America, Haiti and Japan. The film follows her as she plays for Japan, wears face masks to the US Open in support of the Black Lives Matter movement, and travels with her family to the Osaka Foundation — a school for Haitian children established by her parents.

Navigating identity and expectations

Osaka isn’t the only person facing interrogation into their identity.

Many people of mixed-race heritage often have a sense of “racial impostor syndrome”: the sense of doubt they feel when others question the authenticity of their mixed-race background.

It is common for young persons of Japanese background living outside of Japan to only be beginner to intermediate speakers of Japanese. Speaking about her self-confessed “broken” Japanese skills, Osaka worries she is “doing something wrong by not representing the half Black, half-Japanese kids well.”

But Osaka’s openness about these difficulties is exactly how the half Black, half Japanese kids need to be represented.




Read more:
When Naomi Osaka talks, we should listen. Athletes are not commodities, nor are they super human


It is important for us to challenge static ideas of race, ethnicity and nationality by sharing the voices of people of mixed backgrounds like Osaka.

Our identities are complex, and they change over time. There is more to being Japanese than fluently speaking the Japanese language, looking Japanese or holding a Japanese passport.

We shouldn’t forget who Naomi Osaka is. A strong tennis player, a passionate activist, and a mixed-race woman who represents contemporary Japan.The Conversation

Aoife Wilkinson, PhD candidate, The University of Queensland

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Naomi Osaka does NOT automatically relinquish US citizenship by choosing Japanese citizenship

Citizenship is becoming more and more interesting. In my last post I wrote about Canada’s Conservative leader Andrew Scheer’s U.S. citizenship. Theoretically, on October 21, 2019, Canada could have it’s first U.S. citizen Prime Minister. (Think of the extra pressure that the United States could bring to bear on Canada.)

The newsworthiness of U.S. citizenship continues. There has been much discussion of citizenship as a prerequisite to compete for countries in the Olympic games. This week, it is being reported that tennis star Naomi Osaka , a dual Japan/U.S. citizen is complying with a Japanese law that requires her to choose either U.S. or Japanese citizenship. A number of media outlets are reporting that Ms. Osaka is relinquishing U.S. citizenship. Is this really true? Interestingly the Toronto Globe and Mail initially reported that:

The Globe later (presumably realizing their error) changed the title of the article to:

“Naomi Osaka set to represent Japan at Tokyo Olympics”

Note that there is no U.S. law that requires her to choose one citizenship over the other. Ms. Osaka is apparently linking her “choosing Japanese citizenship” to a desire to represent Japan in the upcoming Olympics. A number of media sources are reporting that by choosing Japanese Nationality (under Japanese law) that Ms. Osaka is relinquishing/renouncing U.S. citizenship under U.S. law. This is probably incorrect. The act of “choosing Japanese nationality” under Japanese law does NOT automatically mean that Ms. Osaka has relinquished U.S. citizenship under U.S. law. As a matter of U.S. law:

Unless Ms. Osaka’s “choosing Japanese Nationality” meets the the test of voluntarily and intentionally relinquishing U.S. citizenship under Section 349(a) of the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act, then “choosing Japanese Nationality” will NOT result in the relinquishment of Ms. Osaka’s U.S. citizenship. The act of “choosing Japanese citizenship” under Japanese law does NOT automatically result in the loss of her U.S. citizenship.

Every country is free to decide who it’s citizens are or are not.

Continue reading

Global Entry, NEXUS and the effect of renouncing US citizenship

This is another post in what is becoming a series about “travel documents” for U.S. and Canadian citizens and permanent residents. To travel the world you need to be able to get easy access to and from different countries. “Travel documents” are required. Travel documents include (but are not limited to): passports, permanent resident cards, Global Entry cards and NEXUS cards. Different rules may apply in different contexts (are you traveling by air, land or sea)? My previous posts about “travel documents” have been:

Canadian citizens and permanent residents of Canada

Travel Documents: Canadian citizens need either a U.S. or Canadian passport to enter Canada by air (or by land)

Why would someone renounce their “permanent resident of Canada” status?

Law permanent residents of the United States AKA “Green Card” holders

What’s a #GreenCard anyway? It’s NOT what you don’t know. It’s what you know that isn’t true!

Although a “reentry permit” can provide evidence of intention to reside permanently in the USA, it does ask about tax returns!
This post focuses on the NEXUS program (in the context of the U.S “Global Entry Program”).

I encourage you to visit the U.S. Government “Global Entry” page. You will be amazed at how broad these programs actually are.
Introduction

A common question (I have been asked this many times) for Canadians renouncing U.S. citizenship:

How will my renunciation affect my NEXUS card?

I provided the following “Readers Digest” answer on Quora. But I thought I would provide a broader answer in this post.

Read John Richardson's answer to Can you still qualify for a Nexus card if you renounce your US citizenship after becoming a naturalized Canadian citizen? on Quora

Continue reading