Prologue:
Absolutely – Not all citizenships are the same. https://t.co/rvLYbOkS0J
— John Richardson – Counsellor for US persons abroad (@ExpatriationLaw) March 20, 2025
Mr. Adelman’s problems are caused by and only because of U.S. citizenship taxation.
_________________________________________________________
On March 18, 2025 an article by Margot Patrick appeared in the Wall Street Journal.
A military-contract bonanza, European mansions, disgruntled business partners: The jet-setting case of one of America’s biggest alleged tax cheats. https://t.co/xfSgu6tva5 via @WSJ
— Margot Patrick (@margotpatrick) March 19, 2025
A direct link to the article is here.
Mr. Edelman was a U.S. citizen who had lived outside the United States since the 1990s. The case is NOT about his millions. The case is NOT about offshore companies. The case IS about whether Mr. Edelman’s shares in a foreign corporation were owned by Mr. Edelman personally or by his French citizen wife Delphine Le Dain. The subtitle to Ms. Patrick’s article is:
“Douglas Edelman’s glitzy European lifestyle came to a halt when he was charged with hiding income through companies put in his French wife’s name”
Mr. Edelman is a U.S. citizen. Delphine Le Dain is neither a U.S. citizen nor U.S. resident. The U.S. has limited taxing authority over Ms. Le Dain who is a nonresident alien. Therefore, the Edelman case has huge implications for Americans abroad!
The crux of the issue is who owns the Edelman interest in the corporations? Can the IRS recharacterize the ownership of assets in a marriage?
On March 20, 2025 I participated in a discussion on the Edelman case on the IRS Medic podcast.
I prepared slides for the presentation (updated since the presentation) which may be accessed here:
A pdf version of the slides is here:
The Edelman indictment is here:
https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/usa_v_edelman_et_alindictment.pdf
A summary of the facts from Tax Notes is here:
A. Edelman’s Alleged Criminal Conduct
In May 2024, a grand jury returned a thirty-count indictment charging Edelman with one count of Conspiracy to Defraud the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §371; two counts of False Statements to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1001; fifteen counts of Tax Evasion, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §7201 and 18 U.S.C. §2; and twelve counts of Willful Violation of Foreign Bank Account Reporting Requirements, in violation of 31 U.S.C. §§5314, 5322(b), 18 U.S.C. §2, and associated regulations. The factual allegations supporting those charges are extensive. In short, the Government alleges that Edelman perpetrated a decades-long scheme to defraud the United States of tax revenues by concealing his earnings in an intricate web of financial entities across the globe and by lying to regulators along the way.
https://www.taxnotes.com/research/federal/court-documents/court-opinions-and-orders/individual-charged-tax-evasion-scheme-has-his-release-revoked/7p57j
Additional articles and commentary of interest on the Edelman case include:
Virginia La Torre Jeker
https://www.forbes.com/sites/virginialatorrejeker/2024/07/08/mr-taxman-irs-looks-like-my-money-but-it-really-isnt/
Justice Department Press Release
https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/former-defense-contractor-and-his-wife-indicted-evading-us-taxes-profits-selling-jet-fuel-us
Yaacob Jacob
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-edelman-case-game-changer-us-citizens-abroad-jacob-cpa-us–btqmf/
Mystery At Manas – Page 20
“In July 2010, after Chairman Towns had issued official subpoenas for their documents and testimony, counsel for the companies and its principals disclosed that Erkin Bekbolotov and Delphine Le Dain, the wife of Douglas Edelman, were the named owners of Mina and Red Star, each with 50 percent. Ms. Le Dain has never had any active role with the companies and, for all practical purposes, it would appear that Mr. Edelman controls the shares and is the de facto beneficial owner.47 Mr. Bekbolotov and Mr. Edelman have been the 50-50 shareholders of the companies since Red Star’s founding in 2002,48 but their ownership interests are buried under several layers of straw ownership in jurisdictions known for their corporate secrecy. Though many have tried, it is virtually impossible to determine the companies’ beneficial ownership through public records.49″
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA535786.pdf
PDF Version:
John Richardson – Follow me on X.com at @ExpatriationLaw
