Today is May 15, 2018. Tomorrow Storify closes forever (unless it provides a last minute_ reprieve.
Therefore, I am creating this post to “store” copies of my 6 Storify Stories.
They are being saved here in pdf format. I have also moved them over to my Wakelet account where I will continue posts of this type.
‘Will you walk into my parlour?’ – #Americansabroad and IRS “amnesty” offers in the 2009 #OVDP
Australian Greens Senator @LarissaWaters resigns because of her CANADIAN place of birth. Too bad she was born in Canada
Can the common law “revenue rule” be used to stop the enforcement of U.S. “citizenship taxation” on non-U.S. residents?
My tax professional told me my “non-U.S. mutual fund is a #PFIC! What is a #PFIC and what do I do?
Tax, culture and how the USA uses #citizenshiptaxation to impose US culture (and penalties) on other countries
The “Pax Americana” to the “Tax Americana”: How the USA is imposing a separate, punitive tax regime on “nonresidents”
Category Archives: Little Red FATCA Book
The worldwide trend of attacking the use of corporations as a way to reduce or defer taxation for individuals
Introduction – The war against corporations and the shareholders of those corporations
Corporations as entities that are separate from their shareholder/owners
As every law students knows, a corporation is a legal entity that is separate from its owner. As a legal entity that is separate from its owner, a corporation is capable of holding assets, carrying on a business and investing in a way that results in separation of the shareholder(s) from the business itself. It is a mistake to infer that the corporation’s status as a separate legal entity means that the corporation’s income will not be taxed to its shareholders.
Corporations as legal instruments of tax deferral
When corporate tax rates are lower than individual tax rates, there is incentive for individuals to earn and invest through corporations rather than to earn and invest as individuals. In other words, in certain circumstances, corporations can be used to pay less taxes.
Corporations as instruments of tax evasion
In many jurisdictions is it possible to create a Corporation and NOT disclose the identities of the beneficial owners. Because of this circumstance:
1. Corporations (as was made clear in the “Panama Papers Story”) can be used to hide income and assets for either legitimate or illegitimate reasons; and
2. Corporations can be used to avoid the attribution of income earned by the corporation to the shareholders.
Corporations and the rise of @TaxHavenUSA
Continue reading
Whether through regulation or legislation #FATCA Same Country Exemption won't work
In the beginning there was Facebook …
Thoughts on Representative Maloney's #FATCA Same Country Exemption Bill from #Americansabroad – it's a non-starter! https://t.co/zypKOzkYZ4
— Citizenship Lawyer (@ExpatriationLaw) May 7, 2017
and from a second Facebook group:
Comments from #Americansabroad about the Maloney #FATCA Same Country Exemption bill https://t.co/3wC62P448w – going from bad to worse
— Citizenship Lawyer (@ExpatriationLaw) May 8, 2017
Introduction: If you were to REPEAL FATCA
A previous post discussing the what exactly is meant by FATCA and the Mark Meadows “Repeal FATCA” bill, described:
FATCA is the collective effect of a number of specific amendments to the Internal Revenue Code which are designed to target both (1) Foreign Financial Institutions and (2) Those “U.S. Persons” who are their customers.
1. There are “Three Faces To FATCA” which include:
– Face 1: Legislation targeting Foreign Financial Institutions (Internal Revenue Code Chapter 4)
– Face 2: The FATCA IGAs (which for practical purposes have replaced Chapter 4)
– Face 3: Legislation targeting individuals (primarily Americans abroad who commit “Personal Finance Abroad – While Living Abroad” – Internal Revenue Code 6038D which mandates Form 8938)
2. The amendments to the Internal Revenue Code that would be necessary to reverse the sections of the Internal Revenue that created FATCA.
Legislative FATCA vs. Regulatory FATCA
The sections of the Internal Revenue Code that comprise “FATCA” are surprisingly few.
FATCA Face 1: Internal Revenue Code S. 1474(f) gives Treasury broad authority to make “FATCA regulations”.
Continue reading
Searching for Uncle #FATCA: Where is he? What does he do? Why is he a danger to America? Can Congressman Meadows and Senator Paul save America?
Outline:
April 7, 2017
Senator Rand Paul introduces "Repeal FATCA" bill in the Senate – joining Congressman Meadows Bill in the House https://t.co/InR15hIbJH
— Citizenship Lawyer (@ExpatriationLaw) April 8, 2017
Part 1: Prologue – Introducing Uncle FATCA – Who is he? What does he mean in your life?
Part 2: What is FATCA, what are the FATCA IGAs, what is the Meadows Bill and how do these things interact?
Part 3 – What does it mean to repeal FATCA and how exactly does the Meadow Bill repeal FATCA? A section by section analysis
Part 4: An important reminder – FATCA repeal does not mean IGA repeal
Part 5: The text of FATCA and the text of the Meadows Bill (very dry and technical and not likely to be of interest to the casual reader)
Continue reading
The Bopp FATCA Legal Action U.S. Based Lawsuit
The FATCA Legal Action lawsuit is organized by Republicans Overseas and is prosecuted by the Bopp Law Firm in Indiana. It argues that FATCA is unconstitutional based on a number of legal grounds. One of the plaintiffs is Dr. Steven Kish, who is also the Chair of “The Alliance For The Defence of Canadian Sovereignty” (the organization bringing the FATCA lawsuit in Canada). Interestingly, Dr. Kish reluctantly renounced U.S. citizenship in August of 2016.
What follows are tweets that link to various posts that I have written about the progress of the U.S. based FATCA Legal Action lawsuit. The lawsuit is still held up on “standing issues”. Judge Rose ruled that the plaintiffs did NOT have “standing to sue”. This decision was appealed and argued on January 24, 2017. We are waiting for a decision to see if the lawsuit can proceed. You may listen to Mr. Bopp’s oral argument here.
Judge Rose denies plaintiffs application for injunction in Bopp https://t.co/uaeVrLEYAk lawsuit https://t.co/oCmL4bpUKz #FATCALegalAction
— Citizenship Lawyer (@ExpatriationLaw) April 5, 2017
#YouCantMakeThisUp: Obama Administration blames #Americansabroad 4 injuries in #FATCALegalAction https://t.co/Um7bVaAXKZ via @ADCSovereignty
— Citizenship Lawyer (@ExpatriationLaw) April 5, 2017
Judge Rose dismisses @FATCALawsuit: rules that "case is hereby TERMINATED" – Any harm NOT cause… https://t.co/kNDznjccWT via @ADCSovereignty
— Citizenship Lawyer (@ExpatriationLaw) April 5, 2017
Here is the twitter timeline for @FATCALawsuit:
Tweets by FATCALawsuit
John Richardson
The Little Red #FATCA Book – (Review, Identify and Report on “U.S. Persons”) – How FATCA affects the non-U.S. World
About FATCA – The “worst law nobody has heard of” …
FATCA (The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act) was signed into law – as a revenue offset provision to the Hire Act – in March of 2010. It is doubtful that Congress even knew that FATCA was part of the HIRE Act (“Hiring Incentives To Restore Employment”). Yet, FATCA has created havoc in banking systems around the world, has destroyed the lives of the citizens and residents of other nations (who just happen to have been born in the United States), led to many Americans abroad renouncing their U.S. citizenship and forced banks to waste tens of millions (and this is conservative) of dollars in compliance fees. Interestingly FATCA has also led to other countries actually changing their domestic laws (overriding their own constitutions) to “hunt” for people with a U.S. birthplace. FATCA has generated significant hatred of America and has severely eroded America’s “moral capital” during a time when China is challenging the United States for global supremacy.
FATCA has recently been part of an inquiry by the Government of France into the “overreaching” of U.S. laws. Nigel Green of the Devere Group has joined with Jim Jatras to lobby for the repeal of FATCA.
2012 – The world according to FATCA – For the compliance industry: “The Gift That Just Keeps on Giving” …
Remembering "FATCA Forum" of December 2012 https://t.co/mv7Gw9JT5n – Interesting how attitudes ) understanding have evolved @ADCSovereignty
— John Richardson – lawyer for "U.S. persons" abroad (@ExpatriationLaw) April 5, 2017
2013 – The Pre-IGA World: Looking back at FATCA in December of 2013
Looking back at FATCA in December of 2013 prior to the IGAs: "The two faces of #FATCA: Public for the banks and private for #Americansabroad" https://t.co/gz0LZDt5Yo via @USCitizenAbroad
— John Richardson – lawyer for "U.S. persons" abroad (@ExpatriationLaw) July 22, 2018
2014 – The FATCA IGAs are signed: At Home In Canada – The genesis of the ADSC Lawsuit – Opposition Rising …
#FATCA and how it affects the citizens and residents of "non-U.S. countries" https://t.co/sHlIwAJCKr – #YouCantMakeThisUp @ADCSovereignty
— John Richardson – lawyer for "U.S. persons" abroad (@ExpatriationLaw) April 5, 2017
2015 – Meanwhile, In The Homeland – The Bopp FATCALegalAction.com Lawsuit begins …
The Bopp FATCA Legal Action U.S. Based Lawsuit https://t.co/67hYH7gWF9
— John Richardson – lawyer for "U.S. persons" abroad (@ExpatriationLaw) April 5, 2017
Interestingly, in August 2016, Dr. Stephen Kish, a plaintiff in the Bopp lawsuit and Chair of the Alliance For the Defence of Canadian Sovereignty renounced his U.S. citizenship.
When it's all said and done: All roads lead to renunciation https://t.co/AXeU27WQAM – @ADCSovereignty Chair renounces U.S. citizenship!
— John Richardson – lawyer for "U.S. persons" abroad (@ExpatriationLaw) April 5, 2017
Listen to the legal arguments …
Fascinating! Hear the January 24, 2017 oral appeal argument of @FATCAlawsuit lawyer Jim Bopp – https://t.co/JX6HkiuBeh
— John Richardson – lawyer for "U.S. persons" abroad (@ExpatriationLaw) April 5, 2017
December 2016 – Advocacy For Americans Abroad Fails: U.S. Treasury refuses proposed FATCA Same Country Exemption for Americans Abroad (but not for “Accidental Americans”) …
"All Roads Lead To Renunciation" – #FATCA Same Country Exemption Edition https://t.co/aTeenJOeGF – U.S. Treasury refuses FATCA SCE 4 #expats
— John Richardson – lawyer for "U.S. persons" abroad (@ExpatriationLaw) April 5, 2017
To be clear, much of the FATCA harm caused to “some” Americans abroad could be alleviated with the FATCA Same Country exemption (proposed by “ACA” and “Democrats Abroad”). FATCA SCE could be achieved by regulation. In December of 2016, U.S. Treasury refused to support a regulation creating the FATCA Same Country Exemption.
The Obama administration was:
1. Aware of the harm that FATCA was causing to Americans abroad (leaving aside the harm to the rest of the world); and
2. Refused to provide relief for Americans abroad!
2017 – The world according to FATCA – Hearings in Washington, D.C. …
Rand Paul Urging Executive Action To Nullify FATCA In Landmark Moment https://t.co/FygIalTCmR via @ValueWalk – Reference April 26/17 hearing
— John Richardson – lawyer for "U.S. persons" abroad (@ExpatriationLaw) April 5, 2017
On April 26, 2017, at the initiative of Congressman Mark Meadows and Senator Rand Paul, “FATCA Hearings” will take place in Washington, DC. Although FATCA has been the subject of much discussion outside of the United States, there has been little discussion of FATCA inside the United States. FATCA is NOT well known in the United States.
_________________________________________________________________
The “Little Red FATCA Book” Documenting the “Worldwide Hunt” for “U.S. Persons” …
The Little Red #FATCA Book – (Review, Identify and Report on “U.S. Persons”) – How FATCA affects the non-U.S. World https://t.co/lcA2s2uCQZ
— John Richardson – lawyer for "U.S. persons" abroad (@ExpatriationLaw) April 5, 2017
The “Little Red FATCA Book” is a collection of posts that I created over an 18 month period. I have decided to collect the individual posts and organize them in one place. I have grouped the individual posts into seven broad chapters (reflecting evolution and topic) which I will call:
- Chapter A – How FATCA impacts the non-U.S. world: Describing The Harm and Impact – Parts 1 – 25
- Chapter B – The Canadian Response – The Alliance For The Defence Of Canadian Sovereignty and the FATCA Lawsuit Against The Government of Canada – Parts 26 – 27
- Chapter C – The 2017 Meadows Bill: What Does FATCA Repeal Actually Mean? – Part 28 – 29
- Chapter D – The 2018 Posey initiative:
- Chapter E – 2018 The European Union Fights Back (well maybe)
- Chapter F – General: Fixing FATCA Through “Regulation” instead of through “Legislation”
- Chapter G – General: When enacting FATCA: What Did Congress Know and WHEN Did Congress Know It?
This is a “work in progress”. Some of the individual posts are incomplete and subject and are likely to be revised.
FATCA which is essentially the enforcement mechanism of U.S. “Place of Birth Taxation” is a controversial topic. Feel free to post your thoughts and comments.
John Richardson
Continue reading
Part 21: What God Hath Wrought – The #FATCA Inquisition (Review, Identify and Report on “U.S. Persons”) – #FATCA results in denial of bank accounts for #ESL Teachers who @TeachAbroad
#ESL Teachers who @TeachAbroad denied bank accounts bc of US citizenship! https://t.co/5Ou1QC9LiK
— Citizenship Lawyer (@ExpatriationLaw) March 20, 2016
The above tweet references a fascinating conversation on Reddit.
The conversation begins with:
Hey all, just got back from the Bank of China because I wanted to open an account to hopefully find some easier method of transferring money back home to the States (an entirely different fiasco for another time), but after the bank teller floundering around with his supervisor for a good hour and a half, they finally told me I couldn’t get a card today and would have to try again some other time, which they would call me and let me know. How nice of them.
This is already the second time I’ve tried to go and been turned away. The first time they told me I needed proof that I was actually employed in China (to which apparently my valid residence permit was not enough), and so in true Chinese fashion, I had my school simply write down on a piece of paper that I worked there and then stamp it. Good enough.
Anyway, they told me that today I couldn’t open up an account because their system is “complicated” and there are a number of other people with “similar names to mine” and their system is too slow to process it today. This is of course just a string of nonsense and I don’t see how it’s any form of excuse whatsoever. My buddy opened his account no problem, so I can’t decipher why my situation might be any different. Unless of course it’s because he’s Australian and I’m American, which is the only difference. On the forms you have to fill out, there’s a simple question that says to check if you’re American or not American, and I think this is what may have flagged my account. With everything going on in Beijing and tightening controls on VPNs at the moment, I can’t but help to think this is the reasoning behind the vague excuse. Anyone else experiencing similar problems?
TL;DR: went to Bank of China, couldn’t open an account right now, and I think it’s because I’m American.
Related articles
Part 22: What God Hath Wrought – The #FATCA Inquisition (Review, Identify and Report on “U.S. Persons”) – Oh my God! #FATCA affects even a Paypal account!
#FATCA and the lowly Paypal account. Everybody answers to the accusation of having "USness"! #YouCantMakeThisUp! pic.twitter.com/F6fBf7Tlvv
— Citizenship Lawyer (@ExpatriationLaw) March 20, 2016
Part 18: What God Hath Wrought – The #FATCA Inquisition (Review, Identify and Report on “U.S. Persons”) – Responding to the #FATCA Letter
Are you or have you even been a "US Person"? Responding to the #FATCA Letter https://t.co/4FPF4WK7vT
— Citizenship Lawyer (@ExpatriationLaw) April 25, 2016
The above tweet references an earlier post about the FATCA Letter and how to respond.
Part 25: What God Hath Wrought – The #FATCA Inquisition (Review, Identify and Report on “U.S. Persons”) – What if the 8 month year old Canadian is a "US Person"?
Baby girl drawn into CRA-IRS information sharing controversy https://t.co/2FG6cEdNZV – What if that 8 month year old is a "US Person"?
— Citizenship Lawyer (@ExpatriationLaw) April 18, 2016