Introduction And Summary
This is Part 5 in my “Little Red Dual Citizenship Book” Series. For parts 1 to 4, see the Appendix.
The proliferation of “dual citizenship” in the 21st century is a benefit for individuals. As Boston Globe Correspondent journalist David Shribman explains, dual citizenship may be a critical part of an individual’s identity. That said, “dual citizenship” may not be a benefit (and may be a danger) for countries in certain circumstances. The purpose of this post is (in part) to question whether dual citizens of a country should have the same class of rights as those who are ONLY citizens of the country. Should Canada/US dual citizens living in Canada have the same rights of citizenship as those who are ONLY Canadian citizens living in Canada. For example, should dual citizens be permitted to vote in Canadian elections? Should dual citizens be permitted to run for public office?
This recent article in the Toronto Globe and Mail reinforces the validity of this question.
Tariffs, violations of USMCA, US water shortages, questioning the location of the Canada/US border and describing Canada as the 51st state are (tragically) changing how Canadians perceive the USA.
Thoughts of those with Canada/US @dualcitizenship?https://t.co/1FSzHNZL9k
— John Richardson – Counsellor for US persons abroad (@ExpatriationLaw) March 28, 2025